I’m completely funded by you! This month, I’d like to earn the support of 75 new paying subscribers. That will allow me to spend as much time as possible bringing you stories like this.
If you appreciate my work, please consider a $5/month or $50/year subscription.
If you can’t financially support my efforts, please consider sharing my work with your friends and family to spread the message. I can’t do it without you.
They’re coming for your parental rights.
I’ve covered probably at least half a dozen stories on this substack showing you that schools are actively hiding information from parents regarding their child’s gender status, including this report from Parents Defending Education showing 6,000 schools doing so as a matter of policy.
Parents Defending Education has since updated that number to over 7,000 schools.
When they do this, they justify it by saying the child might not be safe if they are honest with the parents about the child’s gender identity.
And, in some school districts, they consider the child’s safety to be so at risk with their parents that they actively plan to lie to parents about what names and pronouns they are using. Remember this email from a recent story about a woke school district in Colorado:
In many school districts, when a child needs permission for something, they need to get a signature from a “trusted adult.” That does not mean their parents - a teacher could be considered a “trusted adult” from the school district’s perspective.
And Parental Rights bills are being introduced in legislatures to support the rights of parents and their involvement in schools, and the group fighting against them the hardest is the teachers union.
If none of that was enough to convince you that your parental rights are under attack, I’m going to give you one more: Today at the University of Connecticut Law school, there is a full-day symposium pondering the question of if parental rights are always in the best interest of child. This is real, and the keynote will be given by a professor from NYU Law that previously clerked for Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor.
The symposium will have three panels:
Parental Rights and School Curriculum, including panelists from UCLA Law, University of South Carolina Law, and Harvard Law
Parental Rights and Gender-Affirming Care, with panelists from Harvard Law, Yale University, and GLAD
Parent Rights and Race and Family Regulation, including panelists from SMU Law, Fordham University Law, University of Denver Law, and University of Baltimore Law
A whole day of some of the most influential legal minds in the nation discussing how to take parental rights away and why it’s in the best interest of the child to do so.
Are you awake yet? Do you see what’s happening?
Let me know what you think in the comments. And please share this article with every parent you know to show them what’s happening right in front of us.
Fight back against the woke and support my work.
I believe the woke - on the left and the right - are an existential threat to our values as Americans. Some of them know it, most of them are just useful innocents. Regardless, fighting back against this woke cultural revolution is my full-time job. I’m dedicated to exposing the woke ideology in our country, helping people to understand what’s going on, and providing spaces for non-woke people to connect, support each other, and plan ways to fight back.
Here’s how you can help.
Thank you sooo much Karlyn for finding out about this CLS symposium. It's so important to inform the public about this sh*t; Tucker Carlson should cover it on his show!
What completely undermines their "reasoning," is that they are in charge of children 1440 hours of their lives per year, while parents are in charge 7320 hours per year every single year of their lives. And, that's just during school years. If a teacher damages a student or doesn't tell a parent what is happening with their child, how are the parents to get their child help? The time a child spends with an individual teacher is a blip. It is psychologically harmful to confuse their role as an educator with that of a psychologist. It's criminal, in my opinion.