Gays Against Groomers Meltdown, Part 2: Founder Jaimee Michell and GAG leadership responds to reporting on whistleblowers
....and seems to be coming even more unhinged.
Because of you, I’m able to withstand internet smear campaigns when influencers don’t like my reporting on them. This month, I’d like to earn the support of 75 new paying subscribers. That will allow me to spend as much time as possible bringing you stories like this that you won’t find anywhere else. We’re about 38% of the way to the goal so far:
If you appreciate my work, please consider a $5/month or $50/year subscription.
If you can’t financially support my efforts, please consider sharing my work with your friends and family to spread the message. I can’t do it without you.
Last night I, along with some of the Gays Against Groomers whistleblowers who spoke to me to produce this reporting regarding the dysfunction within the organization, sat and watched in wonder as GAG founder Jamiee Michell and treasurer/HR manager Sasha Leigh responded to the piece:
For the whistleblowers, Jaimee and Sasha’s responses confirmed that they made exactly the right decision.
Since the article hit the internet, Jaimee in particular has become completely unhinged and is engaging in a targeted smear/harassment campaign against me to deflect from every accusation made against her in the article.
I’ll show you evidence of that in this follow-up.
But that’s not all! There will also be a part 3 of this series dropping today, with a brand new set of whistleblower documents I just received.
I promise, you won’t want to miss it.
But first, let’s talk smear campaigns.
In my first article about Gays Against Groomers founder Jaimee Michell, I shared that every whistleblower I spoke to told me they believe emphatically that Jaimee is a narcissist that started the organization for internet clout, not because of any desire to end grooming. Here’s a quote that sums up the feelings of all I talked to:
“It’s ALL about Jaimee. This is not about the work; it’s not about helping parents or teachers in the cities individually, this is all about Jaimee. She’s follower drunk, she’s completely delusional, and probably the most incompetent ‘leader’ I have ever seen. The incompetency is astounding. And the gaslighting and the bullshit that all comes with narcissism, we know how that goes.”
One of the things that is very important to understand about narcissists is that, when they are wounded by someone revealing their imperfections or when a person has failed to deliver them something they feel entitled to, they are prone to engage in smear campaigns.
If you have a narcissist in your life, you’ll want to check out the book Smeared by HG Tudor to learn more about how this works and what to do about it. It is invaluable information.
In the book, HG Tudor (who is, himself, a diagnosed narcissistic psychopath) discusses the goal of the smear campaign against what the narcissist considers “The Trouble Maker”:
“We are saddled with this particular person. They have reservations about us, they have not warmed to us or they may even have an inkling about what we are. There are various degrees of this, but ultimately they will not embrace our seduction and fall in with the spell we have cast over you and overs. Thus, they are marked out as a trouble maker. They must be isolated so that their opinions are not only able to be voiced far less frequently…and when they do, you are less likely to listen to them. The smear campaign achieves this isolation.”
It’s essential to have this context to understand what you are about to witness regarding Gays Against Groomers leader Jaimee Michell.
Because, in this case, I’m her trouble maker.
That is why she is lashing out at me instead of focusing on the powerful grievances of the members of her organization.
To understand what you’re about to see from Jaimee, you must understand that I’ve been the target of harassment by people in the anti-woke space for over two years…and the same people who have been harassing me are involved with Gays Against Groomers, which means they are friends with Jaimee Michell.
That means that Jaimee is promoting their smear campaigns against me. She has no new material that has not already been spread all over the internet by her friends for petty revenge.
The last time a group announced they would target me with a cancel mob, I wrote this piece explaining the smears they would be using. The same piece applies in the case of Jaimee:
In particular, you’ll hear a lot about this accusation today - that I dated/married a pedophile. Not true.
But remember, a woke cancel mob like the one that Jaimee is currently trying to spin up doesn’t care about the truth. They only care about the smear. Here’s what actually happened:
And no, I will not apologize. Never apologize to a cancel mob, and never apologize when you did nothing wrong.
If you have a lot of time and want the full and complete story of the smear campaign this group has led against me for over two years now, you can refer to my Substack all about that topic, Surviving Keri Smith:
With that out of the way, let’s see what happened.
Back in December, Gays Against Groomers released a Code of Conduct policy regarding member activity on social media:
I’m sure we won’t see any leadership of the organization breaking that code of conduct today.
In this section, I’m just going to show you screenshots of everything that Jamiee, Sasha and other Gays Against Groomers leadership have said in the last 15 hours or so, and allow you to decide for yourself what you think of their behavior and professionalism.
Remember, Jaimee is the founder of Gays Against Groomers and Sasha is the treasurer and HR manager. Both of them are on the board of directors and their two votes control the entire organization, because there are only three people on the board. The third member has not involved himself in any of this.
From the first article, we know that Jaimee is committed to professionalism in Gays Against Groomers. She told this former member that when she was dismissing their grievances
I’ll allow you to be the judge of the professionalism displayed by their public responses.
Before the article was even released, the Executive Director of Gays Against Groomers released a statement saying that the people who spoke to me are AGAINST the first to end sexualization, indoctrination and medicalization of children:
The first article and the statements from the whistleblowers in it debunk that claim. It’s almost like they were trying to get ahead of the article by smearing the whistleblowers in retaliation.
Jaimee’s first response was to criticize the number of likes I got on a tweet about of my article and to accuse me of condoning grooming and child rape. Because Twitter likes are the greatest indicator of truth and a founder that is deeply committed to ending grooming.
And then Jaimee launched into posting as much material smearing me on Twitter as she could:
She even ran a poll for her audience, as any founder of any professional organization would do:
And she wrote a whole thread underneath the poll:
Very professional!
Now, after Jaimee claimed she was going to bed, she kept going and I found this post to be fascinating:
Because, you see, in part 1 I had a screenshot from Jaimee specifically saying that she didn’t care what we released because she’s said it all on the internet before.
So, if Jaimee had no problem with the screenshots being released because she’s been saying it for years, then why would she feel the need to punch at all?
To that question, Jaimee responded with more smears:
Gays Against Groomers Communications Director Judith also weighed in with the smear campaign, more proof that the organization is in solid hands!
Judith also happens to be lying, because she read Surviving Keri Smith and knew all about the smear campaign that their member was waging against me, and said she was going to talk to Jaimee about getting him removed.
While I am loath to share private DMs of conversations I’ve had with people in confidence, I do think it’s necessary to give people a sense of the values of the leadership of this organization.
Ahhh well, they’ve got to present a united front in public, don’t they? The truth is not beneficial to their narrative.
Jaimee finally went to bed last night, only to wake up and continue today.
She even started responding to every tweet that I sent with smears because she wanted me to block her so that she could declare victory.
Here are her tweets about me today, without commentary:
Jaimee calling my reporting “retarded” was just the cherry on top of her exhibition of professionalism.
I’m actually really excited by that last response from Jaimee (although I’m sure she’ll continue after I publish this) because she makes it very clear that she is 100% fine with me releasing more whistleblower documents in Part 3, which will be coming up next.
That’s very kind of her!
Now let’s take a look at HR manager Sasha’s responses.
Sasha seemed to be very confused by the fact that I did not write a more outrage-based article. She seemed to be demanding more “sauce.”
Of course, everyone has different tastes in journalism, and my preference is more to provide nuance, context, and receipts and allow people to decide for themselves.
Apparently, nuance, context, and receipts are not Sasha’s jam. Here are her responses, with a bit of commentary when necessary:
Of interesting note is that Sasha seemed to confirm that she - the organization’s HR manager - did the things that the whistleblowers said she did.
You will have to decide if your values align with Gays Against Groomers’ actions because there seems to be no dispute over what occurred.
None of the leadership has disputed any of the facts:
Apparently, we should never tell the truth about lesbians because they will openly retaliate against you for revenge.
That’s what people who run a professional organization do.
That’s all for now! I’ll walk through all of this on my stream today at 5pm eastern. And if you can’t make it live, you can always watch it on demand:
What do you think?
What is your opinion of Gays Against Groomers after reading this article? Is Jaimee just a professional CEO, or is she the most professional CEO in the history of CEOs?
Leave a comment and let me know more about what you think!
Fight back against the woke and support my work.
I believe the woke - on the left and the right - are an existential threat to our values as Americans. Some of them know it, most of them are just useful innocents. Regardless, fighting back against this woke cultural revolution is my full-time job. I’m dedicated to exposing the woke ideology in our country, helping people to understand what’s going on, and providing spaces for non-woke people to connect, support each other, and plan ways to fight back.
Here’s how you can help.