This month, I’ve set a goal of earning paid subscriptions from 50 more people to support my work. If you appreciate my work, please consider a $5/month or $50/year subscription.
If you can’t financially support my efforts, please consider sharing my work with your friends and family to spread the message. I can’t do it without you.
In Season 3, Episode 9 of The Handmaid’s Tale, the protagonist June Osborne is required to sit in the hospital day after day, kneeling by the bedside of her walking partner Ofmatthew.
Ofmatthew is pregnant, but was shot by a guard in the previous episode and is now brain dead. But in this dystopian reality, the baby inside her is all that matters, and they keep her on life support until the baby is delivered and delivered to the parents the state has granted the child too, members of the elite class that rule over their world.
Think this sounds far-fetched? Think again. We are barrelling our way toward this reality if the far-left has its way, and most people are completely unaware of it.
In this piece, I’m going to prove to you three things:
Abolition of the biological family is a core aim of Marxism.
Abolition of the biological family is a concept being advanced today, in real life, including at Ivy League universities.
They will achieve their goal of abolishing the biological family through universal surrogacy, just as they did in 1984, Brave New World, Logan’s Run, The Giver…basically every dystopian movie ever. And that includes potentially using the bodies of brain-dead women to gestate children.
Seriously.
Buckle up. This will be the most dystopian thing you read all week.
Marxists want to abolish the biological family.
In the Communist Manifesto, it states that one of their goals is to abolish the family and they will use the schools in order to advance their messaging.:
“Abolition of the family! Even the most radical flare up at this infamous proposal of the Communists.
On what foundation is the present family, the bourgeois family, based? On capital, on private gain. In its completely developed form this family exists only among the bourgeoisie. But this state of things finds its complement in the practical absence of the family among the proletarians, and in public prostitution.
The bourgeois family will vanish as a matter of course when its complement vanishes, and both will vanish with the vanishing of capital.
Do you charge us with wanting to stop the exploitation of children by their parents? To this crime we plead guilty.
But, you will say, we destroy the most hallowed of relations, when we replace home education by social.
And your education! Is not that also social, and determined by the social conditions under which you education, by the intervention, or direct or indirect, of society, by means of schools, etc? The Communists have not invented the intervention of society in education; they do but seek to alter the character of that intervention, and to rescue education from the influence of the ruling class.
The bourgeois clap-trap about the family and education, about the hallowed co-relation of parent and child, becomes all the more disgusting, the more, by the action of Modern Industry, all family ties among the proletarians are torn asunder, and their children transformed into simple articles of commerce an instruments of labour.”
Marx and Engels told us they were unapologetic about abolishing the family, and they planned to use the schools to achieve their aims.
Family Abolition is a real movement today on the far left.
In the pro-life movement, oftentimes you’ll hear them say that if the liberals abort all their children, that will solve the problem because only conservatives will raise kids.
But, as usual, the left is light years ahead of the right.
First, they took over the schools so every time the conservatives dropped off their little darlings to partake in public education, they’d be brainwashed with far-left ideology starting in kindergarten. Kids spend more hours a day at school than they do with their parents. That makes the schools more influential.
So, they don’t need to have their own kids. They’ll take yours.
But, of course, that’s not good enough. It’s not enough to brainwash your kids through the schools because, at the end of the day, they’re still your kids.
And Marxists don’t believe in private property.
They believe everything should belong to the state.
As long as people are connected to their biological family, they won’t be 100% reliant on the state.
Therefore, they posit we must get rid of the biological family entirely and have all children born via surrogacy. That way, you will have no Gods before the state.
If you’ve been keeping up with Socialism Saturday, you know that we have repeatedly watched episodes on this topic, including a lecture recently given at the University of Pennsylvania. Here’s a clip:
Sophie Lewis, the woman in the above clip, is the most prominent advocate for abolishing the family. She’s written two books on the subject: Full Surrogacy Now: Feminism Against Family and Abolish the Family: A Manifesto for Care and Liberation.
This is the introduction to Full Surrogacy Now:
It is a wonder we let fetuses inside us.
Unlike almost all other animals, hundreds of thousands of humans die because of their pregnancies every year, making a mockery of UN millennium goals to stop the carnage.
In the United States, almost 1,000 people die while doing childbirth each year and another 65,000 “nearly die.”
This situation is social, not simply “natural.” Things are like this for political and economic reasons: we made them this way. Pregnancy undoubtedly has its pleasures; natality is unique. That is why, even as others suffer deeply from their coerced participation in pregnancy, many people excluded from the experience for whatever reason—be they cis, trans, or nonbinary—feel deeply bereft. But even so, and even in full recognition of the sense of the sublime that people experience in gestating, it is remarkable that there isn’t more consistent support for research into alleviating the problem of pregnancy.
And later in the book, Lewis writes the following:
Gestational Commune
“Full surrogacy now,” “another surrogacy is possible”: to the extent that these interchangeable sentiments imply a revolutionary program (as I’d like them to) I’d propose it be animated by the following invitations. Let’s bring about the conditions of possibility for open-source, fully collaborative gestation. Let’s prefigure a way of manufacturing one another noncompetitively. Let’s hold one another hospitably, explode notions of hereditary parentage, and multiply real, loving solidarities. Let us build a care commune based on comradeship, a world sustained by kith and kind more than by kin. Where pregnancy is concerned, let every pregnancy be for everyone. Let us overthrow, in short, the “family.”
This woman has lectured at multiple universities and is currently a visiting scholar at the University of Pennsylvania. She currently has almost 20,000 followers on Twitter.
And not for nothing, but she’s clearly working out her own daddy issues live on the BBC:
This is not a drill. She’s not a lone wolf crackpot. And she’s not the only one that believes this.
How will they achieve full surrogacy?
At first, I thought the ultimate plan for the full surrogacy movement would involve birthing pods and artificial wombs to “grow” the children before they are assigned to their household by the state.
By the way, conservative pro-lifers are all excited over these pods because they believe they will end abortion and SAVE BABIES. If only they could understand what they’ll really be used for.
Until last week.
In November 2022, an article called Whole Body Gestational Donation was published in the Journal of Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics.
Here is the abstract:
“Whole body gestational donation offers an alternative means of gestation for prospective parents who wish to have children but cannot, or prefer not to, gestate. It seems plausible that some people would be prepared to consider donating their whole bodies for gestational purposes just as some people donate parts of their bodies for organ donation. We already know that pregnancies can be successfully carried to term in brain-dead women. There is no obvious medical reason why initiating such pregnancies would not be possible.”
The author also posits that maybe even male bodies could be used to circumvent objections from feminists.
“I suggest that brain stem dead men would also have the potential to gestate, meaning that the pool of potential donors is further increased – and that certain feminist concerns might thus be assuaged … The prospect of male pregnancy is not, as many would imagine, fanciful, or a piece of science fiction”
Looks like men really can have babies after all! They anticipate implanting the baby in the liver.
This journal article was originally reported in Reduxx. I guess the idea of male pregnancy wasn’t convincing for the feminists after all.
So, at the beginning of this article, I told you I’d prove the following:
Abolition of the biological family is a core aim of Marxism.
Abolition of the biological family is a concept being advanced today, in real life.
They will achieve their goal of abolishing the biological family through universal surrogacy, including potentially using the bodies of brain-dead women to gestate children.
You may disagree, but I’d say I fulfilled the promise.
Are we in dystopia yet?
What do you think?
Have you ever seen something more dystopian than this?? Leave a comment and let me know! And please share this with your friends and family who need to learn this information.
Fight back against the woke and support my work
I believe the woke - on the left and the right - are an existential threat to our values as Americans. Some of them know it, most of them are just useful innocents. Regardless, fighting back against this woke cultural revolution is my full-time job. I’m dedicated to exposing the woke ideology in our country, helping people to understand what’s going on, and providing spaces for non-woke people to connect, support each other, and plan ways to fight back.
Here’s how you can help.
Disturbing. Have any of the gestational donation theory advocates presented any serious evidence regarding the probable long-term psychological, emotional and other impacts on all involved persons?
As someone who just had a baby, the thought of just handing my son over to the state to give to whoever they think deserves him is awful. On a primal level I hate this idea and want to fight it.
On a intellectual level I understand the reasoning. They want complete loyalty to the state and only the state. It makes me wonder when they will go after homeschoolers. If Marxist can outlaw homeschooling, they will have complete control over programming children and getting rid of the family will be next would be my prediction.