Well, of course, because us considering ourselves individuals at all is against the collective! And it's frightening. Not only would I have no intellectual rights to my works, I could be prevented from writing at all - it would either be throught enforced "collaboration" or having my words passed through endless committees (as happened to Andre Breton, Paul Eluard, etc.).
So am I understanding this right?
The Constitution has to go, because they can not overthrow Capitalism as long as we have Individual rights?
Well, of course, because us considering ourselves individuals at all is against the collective! And it's frightening. Not only would I have no intellectual rights to my works, I could be prevented from writing at all - it would either be throught enforced "collaboration" or having my words passed through endless committees (as happened to Andre Breton, Paul Eluard, etc.).