And, as an academic with a Ph.D. myself, I need to know her sources. What peer-reviewed studies does she cite? What quantitative data does she provide? How many longitudinal studies of indigenous people around the world has she conducted or consulted for her assertions?
Your guess is correct. They NEVER expose themselves to debate or critics because it is all false.
I have a question for you, if you don't mind.
There have been maybe five or so who have have been questioned in Senate hearings and they are always so horribly humiliating, I don't understand why they even show up. There was a senator who spent all this allotted time to ask ONE QUESTION of a doctor who was supporting gender affirming procedures. He wanted her to name 1 medical journal study stating strong evidence of benefits of puberty blockers.
My question is, why would a scientist committing a fraud put herself or himslf in the position to answer medical questions, in a televised setting, in a Senate hearing, knowing she or he is going to be asked doctor- questions and expect them to give actual doctor- answers knowing they are going sound like a grifter or a mental patient and that everyone they have ever known will see it?
Abortion + "trans-liberation" as reproductive justice just means no babies and the population of the earth does off. Well, done, Socialist. You saved the planet. For what?
This is the reason why I'm not impressed with people like Yaron Brook, because so long as there's ROI involved, they're all for this crap, too. Sorry if that's kind of off-topic, but for a guy who comes across as "objective" about reality, he actually promotes lunacy if the dollars are there. Anyway, keep up the good work, Karlyn. I'm just staying low for now.
Yeah, nothing terribly new here, but it's nice to see one of them vocalize all of it in one place. Nice to have it all in one place from one keynote speaker to show to others who don't think that socialists "are that bad". Granted, if I show this off I'll just hear, "well, that's just one person." 🙄
And to answer the question, and to borrow from you, the purpose is to "disrupt capitalism". They seem to think that this will help them undermine the current social order and lead in their "revolution'.
That's BLM, but they describe themselves as bring "trained Marxists" and it's dated 2020. However I seem to remember you pointing out that about Marxism in one of your investigations earlier too. Not sure where you pointed that out though, however I seem to remember you pointing that out too.
Oh, and thanks Karlyn for being willing to do this grunt work and save us all the eye watering/brain melting experience of actually going to these conferences AND having to pony up money that supports them. You're doing a great job with this- documenting their beliefs, words, and actions.
The 1st clip was talking about the colluding with White Supremacy colonization and capitalism.
Now I understand what you was trying to tell me in the Zoom call!
They do know it!
But they use it as a fear tactic:
Just like the Right Wing does.
So, they are Both doing the same thing.
------
In the clip next to the last one on the bottom:
She was talking about being very honest, and that people are just affirm the fact they have experienced those things. So how can we do that and take on a Revolution?
so the conundrum is...
How can they be community of care... and take on a Revolution?
When they have books about ---> affirming, that we are All Racist and colonizers with out doing the same thing they talk about?
The mindphulque about Marxism, at some point, is trying to understand how it is they believe this stuff. There are at least two levels; the ppl who know it is a grift and the ppl they are indoctrinating. But, it's not like Marxism has a set of virtues or even values the truth. They ADVISE teachers to lie when it suits their purpose and even to create a method of intellectualization to fit their needs if the lying becomes too much and tells them to "spread marxist principles throughout their journey thru acadamia."
You would think intellect and truth go hand in hand. Generally, they do, but truth sometimes requires courage. And, what I have seen is that, the ideal candidate is someone intelligent with an unresolved childhood issue.
So, if you were bullied throughout 6th grade those traumatic unresolved memories will keep cyclying thru your mind your whole life until you undo them. At some point, years or decades later, when you determine what you SHOULD have done, then, when these memories come up, you could apply this new knowledge like daydreaming or fantasizing about how you should have handled it. This will release the emotion (electricity) that each bit of traumatic memory is made of just like you are trying to run down a battery. You can keep walking back into it until it is completely discharged. Then, no more trauma.
BUT, ppl who don't do this get that fear triggered over and over throughout their lives until it is WAY worse, psychologically, than the actual event. At THIS point, if some "Women's Studies" professor convinces you that, "Since it was males who did this to you, back then, it is perfectly moral to take it out on other males, today," you will embrace that professor and become less and less critical about anything false she says.
I was very close to someone in this position. Science degrees in biology and computer science, an amazing vocalist and actress, and she was also a professional artist who would be called to do murals on businesses and excellent logic skills. Then, one day she started laying down these concepts. Each one of 7 or 8 I easily refuted before she was done explaining it. It was like talking to a 6th grader. I didn't get what had happened there. Two years later, i realized these were each post-modernist concepts by Derrida. She even seemed surprised that they each were false . She was about 45 years old. I was invited to be in some musicals and saw this in ppl repeatedly.
Did this woman you are talking about, understand the manipulation that of a cult like behaviors, was being used on her?
Or did she go in hook line and sinker?
Not to come back because of pride?
This is what I am finding!
People that you would think could see the truth and say, "Oh wait, I think there is a problem with this logic, it's not adding up right?"
People that only believe what peer reviewed and forget that its just a "Review" not yet not gone through the peer-review filter.
The Peer review, a fundamental principle of modern research?
That (Critical Theory) and or (Critical Race Theory) is still just that a theory?
Their theory does not hold water has too many holes in it like some really wonderful tasting swiss cheese.
AND to make matters worse: all the money they are putting into essential constituent at all stages of a researcher's life. : thesis, recruitment, request for funding for research projects, publications, etc. are being put into this!
So how many children have to go through this before they find out its a bad idea?
(Sorry for the delay in relpying. I cut my hand on a tablesaw and couldn't type much with stitches.....ill be 100% soon....)
You and I are on the same EXACT issue. "How is it that they come to believe what is not difficult to verify as FALSE?"
Did she understand she was being indoctrinated?
That is a complicated question. It's like you WANTING to believe something a certain person says, so, after they say it, you embrace it and never try to verify it. That way there is no proof either way, for now.
THIS is where I'm learning what it is that makes all this possible or at least some of it. Truth is a very simple concept; two modes; TRUE or FALSE. If it is so simple WHY is it continuously an issue? It's not so much KNOWING what the truth is as it is having the ability to move past the FEAR of possible scorn or ridicule for telling it, and being able to accept truths about one's self that are distasteful.
When a person is has an "emotional liability" meaning an unresolved childhood trauma, personality disorder or dysfunction, their ability to express or embrace certain ideas is seriously compromised. In this case, it has to do with childhood bullying. I would feel bad for revealing a secret but I know three other adults with the same exact liability but they work the same.
I need to explain some of the bully dynamics for a minute.
FIrst of all, handling bullies has some pretty standard answers, but still, they didn't figure them out, back then. For example, if bullies ask you to do something dangerous or humiliating, NO MATTER WHAT, do NOT do it. If you do it, they will laugh like hyenas and you will be their new funnest project. If you think that acquiesing will make them like you, they already don't have any feelings for you. But if you don't do the thing, they might get mad, they might hit you, unlikely, but so what. You will now be boring to them and they will find a new victim.
If someone learns later what they SHOULD HAVE done, they could apply it to their memories as they cycle thru their mind. In a short time, they can have discharged all the traumatic energy out of the memories AND they will know how to handle bullies in the future.
However, if a person is 40ish and has not handled this, it means this has been triggered million times since then and is now MUCH WORSE than the actual thing.
...Here it is... At some point, she said in passing something like, "Since it was men that were doing this but they are gone now, it is ok to take it out on men that are here." Saying something that personal was very rare for her and I knew she was still in pain, but I said, "No, ya psycho, you know it's not!" But, what I got from that was, it was one of her teachers who told her this in a way someone would who is showing they will protect you. You can imagine how meaningful that would be, right?
So, her view of this prof changes from just a 'prof' to someone who has earned her loyalty. BUt i am not sure what course this would have taken place it.
*****
No, I have not experienced the version you described but it seems like it would be the most common one. When I refuted her, she appreciated it and brought it up on her own later. But, that did not translate into her concluding, "I am constantly being given misinformation by these ppl!" So, she is not searching for what we are.
In fact, our falling out was that I "violated" their edict "if you aren't trans you aren't allowed to talk about trans." She came across a quote of Karlin's that I used in an anti-crt site warning ppl about the school actively "transing" your kids...not helping them 'find' themselves, but simply changing them from whatever they are. She had also presented me with a bunch of posts of mine as if she was expecting me to answer for them.
She sent me this msg that was, in form, exactly like Karlyn's was from that a bony narc chic. Every sentence was completely hyperbolic to the point that it didn't really even refer to anything and didn't feel like it was to me. She called me a "fear-monger" and said my information was wildly misconstrued or something. THis part is typical dysfunctional-person reactions. A few days later she said, "So what are you doint for your birthday?" I just said, "Look, I can't even almost trust you anymore, sorry."
These are some scary times, but I still don't see goal #3 happening. The timing is in our favor. Ok, the last of the baby boomers will be retiring in five years and they have had more kids than any generation in history. Most of them don't qualify for the military because they are too obese but most of them can still work.
Also, about the same time, the US will be starting what could be the biggest economic growth since the Civil War. Although inflation will be high, the US is the biggest exporter of agriculture and energy, and in a few years, 85% of the supply chain is within North America. Also, the US has 13,000 miles of water routes used for cargo transport. This method is 30 to 50 times less expensive than air, rail, trucks etc.
This is why the us military finally ceased their role of single-handedly securing all the cargo ships of all the NATO countries engaging in world trade for the last 76 years. Incidentally, still there is not a single country or group of countries that could provide this protection for even one country. Even China is not capable of securing their own cargo ships for world trade.
Sources:
Peter Zeihan - geopolitical analyst -
John Joseph Mearsheimer - professor - University of Chicago
And, as an academic with a Ph.D. myself, I need to know her sources. What peer-reviewed studies does she cite? What quantitative data does she provide? How many longitudinal studies of indigenous people around the world has she conducted or consulted for her assertions?
My guess is 0.
Your guess is correct. They NEVER expose themselves to debate or critics because it is all false.
I have a question for you, if you don't mind.
There have been maybe five or so who have have been questioned in Senate hearings and they are always so horribly humiliating, I don't understand why they even show up. There was a senator who spent all this allotted time to ask ONE QUESTION of a doctor who was supporting gender affirming procedures. He wanted her to name 1 medical journal study stating strong evidence of benefits of puberty blockers.
My question is, why would a scientist committing a fraud put herself or himslf in the position to answer medical questions, in a televised setting, in a Senate hearing, knowing she or he is going to be asked doctor- questions and expect them to give actual doctor- answers knowing they are going sound like a grifter or a mental patient and that everyone they have ever known will see it?
It's a good question. They are either completely committed to the cause in spite of the evidence, true believers in the lie, or well-paid.
Great breakdown & insights Dr. K!!
As a nurse, the first thing I learned in every course about kids is they are not adults in little bodies, physiologically & psychologically.
Mary is a danger to the future of safe nursing practice
Abortion + "trans-liberation" as reproductive justice just means no babies and the population of the earth does off. Well, done, Socialist. You saved the planet. For what?
No. That's not what it means.
They want all children born via surrogacy.
Still limits population
They do not care about population control. That's a right wing talking point, not a left wing one.
To the extent that they program every new human organism to their complete control. No feral births.
This is the reason why I'm not impressed with people like Yaron Brook, because so long as there's ROI involved, they're all for this crap, too. Sorry if that's kind of off-topic, but for a guy who comes across as "objective" about reality, he actually promotes lunacy if the dollars are there. Anyway, keep up the good work, Karlyn. I'm just staying low for now.
"The gender binary is a biological imperative, born from Creation or evolved in nature according to procreative necessity."
Fixed it.
Yeah, nothing terribly new here, but it's nice to see one of them vocalize all of it in one place. Nice to have it all in one place from one keynote speaker to show to others who don't think that socialists "are that bad". Granted, if I show this off I'll just hear, "well, that's just one person." 🙄
.....ok cool, if there's nothing new, I want you to explain to me why they want to abolish the biological nuclear family.
And to answer the question, and to borrow from you, the purpose is to "disrupt capitalism". They seem to think that this will help them undermine the current social order and lead in their "revolution'.
Good. Correct!
LOL! See, I pay attention in class :)
2. Destabilize the system, so that will take down Capitalism.
Here we go: https://nypost.com/2020/09/24/blm-removes-website-language-blasting-nuclear-family-structure/
That's BLM, but they describe themselves as bring "trained Marxists" and it's dated 2020. However I seem to remember you pointing out that about Marxism in one of your investigations earlier too. Not sure where you pointed that out though, however I seem to remember you pointing that out too.
Not what I asked.
I asked you WHY they're doing it.
Surely if this is old news, you understand WHY they're doing it.
That's something I've heard them say for a bit now. I also seem to remember you mentioning that too. That's what I mean about 'nothing new'.
Oh, and thanks Karlyn for being willing to do this grunt work and save us all the eye watering/brain melting experience of actually going to these conferences AND having to pony up money that supports them. You're doing a great job with this- documenting their beliefs, words, and actions.
The 1st clip was talking about the colluding with White Supremacy colonization and capitalism.
Now I understand what you was trying to tell me in the Zoom call!
They do know it!
But they use it as a fear tactic:
Just like the Right Wing does.
So, they are Both doing the same thing.
------
In the clip next to the last one on the bottom:
She was talking about being very honest, and that people are just affirm the fact they have experienced those things. So how can we do that and take on a Revolution?
so the conundrum is...
How can they be community of care... and take on a Revolution?
When they have books about ---> affirming, that we are All Racist and colonizers with out doing the same thing they talk about?
Do I understand it now?
Wait? I am reading too much into this, when it is just simple.
It's meant to be fucked up .. aka .. 2. Destabilize the system:
They already have 1. Gain as much power as possible:
so they are in Stage 2 Destabilize the system..
So she is wondering how are they going to get abound this little part .... community of care... and take on a Revolution?
or am I too busy looking at the sand and not seeing the art the sand is making??
The mindphulque about Marxism, at some point, is trying to understand how it is they believe this stuff. There are at least two levels; the ppl who know it is a grift and the ppl they are indoctrinating. But, it's not like Marxism has a set of virtues or even values the truth. They ADVISE teachers to lie when it suits their purpose and even to create a method of intellectualization to fit their needs if the lying becomes too much and tells them to "spread marxist principles throughout their journey thru acadamia."
You would think intellect and truth go hand in hand. Generally, they do, but truth sometimes requires courage. And, what I have seen is that, the ideal candidate is someone intelligent with an unresolved childhood issue.
So, if you were bullied throughout 6th grade those traumatic unresolved memories will keep cyclying thru your mind your whole life until you undo them. At some point, years or decades later, when you determine what you SHOULD have done, then, when these memories come up, you could apply this new knowledge like daydreaming or fantasizing about how you should have handled it. This will release the emotion (electricity) that each bit of traumatic memory is made of just like you are trying to run down a battery. You can keep walking back into it until it is completely discharged. Then, no more trauma.
BUT, ppl who don't do this get that fear triggered over and over throughout their lives until it is WAY worse, psychologically, than the actual event. At THIS point, if some "Women's Studies" professor convinces you that, "Since it was males who did this to you, back then, it is perfectly moral to take it out on other males, today," you will embrace that professor and become less and less critical about anything false she says.
I was very close to someone in this position. Science degrees in biology and computer science, an amazing vocalist and actress, and she was also a professional artist who would be called to do murals on businesses and excellent logic skills. Then, one day she started laying down these concepts. Each one of 7 or 8 I easily refuted before she was done explaining it. It was like talking to a 6th grader. I didn't get what had happened there. Two years later, i realized these were each post-modernist concepts by Derrida. She even seemed surprised that they each were false . She was about 45 years old. I was invited to be in some musicals and saw this in ppl repeatedly.
Did this woman you are talking about, understand the manipulation that of a cult like behaviors, was being used on her?
Or did she go in hook line and sinker?
Not to come back because of pride?
This is what I am finding!
People that you would think could see the truth and say, "Oh wait, I think there is a problem with this logic, it's not adding up right?"
People that only believe what peer reviewed and forget that its just a "Review" not yet not gone through the peer-review filter.
The Peer review, a fundamental principle of modern research?
That (Critical Theory) and or (Critical Race Theory) is still just that a theory?
Their theory does not hold water has too many holes in it like some really wonderful tasting swiss cheese.
AND to make matters worse: all the money they are putting into essential constituent at all stages of a researcher's life. : thesis, recruitment, request for funding for research projects, publications, etc. are being put into this!
So how many children have to go through this before they find out its a bad idea?
I'm very curious, where have you run into these ppl that got a taste of it and never came back?
Also, when I open this thru Chrome, I come out as Stormy Weather but if I open it thru Edge, I come out as Ish Kabibble. Im ok with that fro now
(Sorry for the delay in relpying. I cut my hand on a tablesaw and couldn't type much with stitches.....ill be 100% soon....)
You and I are on the same EXACT issue. "How is it that they come to believe what is not difficult to verify as FALSE?"
Did she understand she was being indoctrinated?
That is a complicated question. It's like you WANTING to believe something a certain person says, so, after they say it, you embrace it and never try to verify it. That way there is no proof either way, for now.
THIS is where I'm learning what it is that makes all this possible or at least some of it. Truth is a very simple concept; two modes; TRUE or FALSE. If it is so simple WHY is it continuously an issue? It's not so much KNOWING what the truth is as it is having the ability to move past the FEAR of possible scorn or ridicule for telling it, and being able to accept truths about one's self that are distasteful.
When a person is has an "emotional liability" meaning an unresolved childhood trauma, personality disorder or dysfunction, their ability to express or embrace certain ideas is seriously compromised. In this case, it has to do with childhood bullying. I would feel bad for revealing a secret but I know three other adults with the same exact liability but they work the same.
I need to explain some of the bully dynamics for a minute.
FIrst of all, handling bullies has some pretty standard answers, but still, they didn't figure them out, back then. For example, if bullies ask you to do something dangerous or humiliating, NO MATTER WHAT, do NOT do it. If you do it, they will laugh like hyenas and you will be their new funnest project. If you think that acquiesing will make them like you, they already don't have any feelings for you. But if you don't do the thing, they might get mad, they might hit you, unlikely, but so what. You will now be boring to them and they will find a new victim.
If someone learns later what they SHOULD HAVE done, they could apply it to their memories as they cycle thru their mind. In a short time, they can have discharged all the traumatic energy out of the memories AND they will know how to handle bullies in the future.
However, if a person is 40ish and has not handled this, it means this has been triggered million times since then and is now MUCH WORSE than the actual thing.
...Here it is... At some point, she said in passing something like, "Since it was men that were doing this but they are gone now, it is ok to take it out on men that are here." Saying something that personal was very rare for her and I knew she was still in pain, but I said, "No, ya psycho, you know it's not!" But, what I got from that was, it was one of her teachers who told her this in a way someone would who is showing they will protect you. You can imagine how meaningful that would be, right?
So, her view of this prof changes from just a 'prof' to someone who has earned her loyalty. BUt i am not sure what course this would have taken place it.
*****
No, I have not experienced the version you described but it seems like it would be the most common one. When I refuted her, she appreciated it and brought it up on her own later. But, that did not translate into her concluding, "I am constantly being given misinformation by these ppl!" So, she is not searching for what we are.
In fact, our falling out was that I "violated" their edict "if you aren't trans you aren't allowed to talk about trans." She came across a quote of Karlin's that I used in an anti-crt site warning ppl about the school actively "transing" your kids...not helping them 'find' themselves, but simply changing them from whatever they are. She had also presented me with a bunch of posts of mine as if she was expecting me to answer for them.
She sent me this msg that was, in form, exactly like Karlyn's was from that a bony narc chic. Every sentence was completely hyperbolic to the point that it didn't really even refer to anything and didn't feel like it was to me. She called me a "fear-monger" and said my information was wildly misconstrued or something. THis part is typical dysfunctional-person reactions. A few days later she said, "So what are you doint for your birthday?" I just said, "Look, I can't even almost trust you anymore, sorry."
This creepazoid, cringey, anti-scientific sociopath has no business teaching anything associated with health orwelll being.
These are some scary times, but I still don't see goal #3 happening. The timing is in our favor. Ok, the last of the baby boomers will be retiring in five years and they have had more kids than any generation in history. Most of them don't qualify for the military because they are too obese but most of them can still work.
Also, about the same time, the US will be starting what could be the biggest economic growth since the Civil War. Although inflation will be high, the US is the biggest exporter of agriculture and energy, and in a few years, 85% of the supply chain is within North America. Also, the US has 13,000 miles of water routes used for cargo transport. This method is 30 to 50 times less expensive than air, rail, trucks etc.
This is why the us military finally ceased their role of single-handedly securing all the cargo ships of all the NATO countries engaging in world trade for the last 76 years. Incidentally, still there is not a single country or group of countries that could provide this protection for even one country. Even China is not capable of securing their own cargo ships for world trade.
Sources:
Peter Zeihan - geopolitical analyst -
John Joseph Mearsheimer - professor - University of Chicago